'Wellness'

Weight Loss – Diet Doesn’t Matter it’s Eating Fewer Calories

A new study came out this week in the New England Journal of Medicine demonstrating what many of us have been saying for years. With dieting, it doesn’t matter what diet you are on, what matters is that you are eating less (or taking in fewer calories) than you are expending.Balanced Scales

Calories In = Calories Out

If you eat more than you burn up for the day, you will gain weight.

If you eat less than you burn up for the day, you will loose weight.

Or in more technical terms, the conclusions of the published study:

Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize.

The Study

In the study 811 overweight adults were randomly assigned to one of four diets with varying percentages of energy derived from fat, protein and carbs. Each of the diets consisted of similar foods and all met guidelines for cardiovascular health.

Participants were followed for a period of 2 years. They were also offered group and individual instruction sessions during this time.

The main outcome measured at the end of 2 years was the change in body weight. Among the 80% of participants who completed the study, the average weight loss was 4 kg (8.8 lbs.). A smaller percentage 14 – 15% experienced a reduction of at least 10% of their initial body weight. This study also found that attendance at group sessions was strongly associated with weight loss.

Resources:

Sacks FM, Bray GA. Feburary 26, 2009. Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates. New England Journal of Medicine. 360:859-873

Parker-Pope T. February 25, 2009. Study Zeroes In on Calories, Not Diet, for Loss: Fewer Calories (Carbs, Protein or Fat ) Are Called Weight Loss Key. New York Times.

Image: Modified Microsoft Clipart.

1 comment February 27th, 2009

For More Potassium and Less Sodium – Eat more Fruits and Veggies

Banana BunchA new study published in January’s Issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine is demonstrating that the ratio of sodium to potassium may be more important than the amount of sodium or potassium alone.

Senior author Dr. Paul Whelton from Loyloa University Health System was quoted as saying:

There isn’t as much focus on potassium, but potassium seems to be effective in lowering blood pressure and the combination of a higher intake of potassium and lower consumption of sodium seems to be more effective than either on its own in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease.

Potassium Rich Foods

In general, the more processed a food is, the more sodium and less potassium a food has. The diagram from the textbook Understanding Nutrition shows the differences in how much sodium vs. potassium are in food that has been processed or food that has not been processed.

Potassium and Sodium in Food

One way of getting plenty of potassium is to be sure to eat a diet rich in fresh fruits and vegetables. Some examples of Potassium Rich foods:

One Banana – 400 mg Potassium

One Potato – 900 mg Potassium

One cup Spinach – 950 mg Potassium

1/2 cup Raisins – 600 mg Potassium

8 ounces (one cup) Orange Juice – 500 mg Potassium

Sources

Sohn E. February 23, 2009. Potassium to sodium ratio affects the heart: Consuming twice as much potassium as sodium might halve your risk of dying from cardiovascular disease. Los Angeles Times.

DocGuide. January 26, 2009. Low-Sodium, High Potassium is Effective in Lowering Blood Pressure. Loyola University Health System.

Cook NR, Obarzanek E, et. al. 2009. Joint Effects of Sodium Potassium Intake on Subsequent Cardiovascular Disease:The Trials of Hypertension Prevention Follow-up Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(1):32-40.

Add comment February 24th, 2009

Living with Loss eBook – Improving Wellness

Living with Loss eBookWhile not normally a Nutrition topic, the eBook Living with Loss is a wellness topic. This eBook is a good resource for improving or maintaining wellness in the face of a loss, a death or a significant life changing event.

The Living with Loss By Understanding Grief eBook is a complementary resource that I helped write, design, create and get published as part of the Tuolumne County Working Group for Loss & Grief Education and Support.

The booklet was written by Dr. Dyer in 2008 with input from Working Group Members which included a cross section of those interested in Grief and Loss within Tuolumne County.

Download a copy of the eBook by clicking on the eBook image at the left or on the image in the right side bar.

You can find out more about the Living with Loss eBook and even view a smaller version of it on the Grief, Loss and Bereavement Blog.

Add comment February 19th, 2009

Produce and Pestacides – Ones to Eat, Ones to Watch

Pesticides in Produce

The Environment Working Groups Guide is now in its 5th edition. It features the 12 fruits and veggies with the most and least pesticides so you’ll know which ones to buy organic, and which conventionally-grown ones are okay when organic isn’t available.

You can get your own copy of a printer friendly version by visiting the Environmental Working Group’s website.

Lowest in Pesticides (ones to buy)

  • Onions
  • Avocado
  • Sweet Corn (Frozen)
  • Pineapples
  • Mango
  • Sweet Peas (Frozen)
  • Asparagus
  • Kiwi
  • Bananas
  • Cabbage
  • Broccoli
  • Eggplant

Highest in Pesticides (ones to watch)

  • Peaches
  • Apples
  • Sweet Bell Peppers
  • Celery
  • Nectarines
  • Strawberries
  • Cherries
  • Lettuce
  • Grapes (Imported)
  • Pears
  • Spinach
  • Potatoes

The Full List: 43 Fruits & Veggies

Note: The Environmental Working Group ranked a total of 44 different fruits and vegetables but grapes are listed twice because they looked at both domestic and imported samples.

RANK

FRUIT OR VEGGIE

SCORE

1 (worst)

Peaches

100 (highest pesticide load)

2

Apples

96

3

Sweet Bell Peppers

86

4

Celery

85

5

Nectarines

84

6

Strawberries

83

7

Cherries

75

8

Lettuce

69

9

Grapes – Imported

68

10

Pears

65

11

Spinach

60

12

Potatoes

58

13

Carrots

57

14

Green Beans

55

15

Hot Peppers

53

16

Cucumbers

52

17

Raspberries

47

18

Plums

46

19

Oranges

46

20

Grapes-Domestic

46

21

Cauliflower

39

22

Tangerine

38

23

Mushrooms

37

24

Cantaloupe

34

25

Lemon

31

26

Honeydew Melon

31

27

Grapefruit

31

28

Winter Squash

31

29

Tomatoes

30

30

Sweet Potatoes

30

31

Watermelon

25

32

Blueberries

24

33

Papaya

21

34

Eggplant

19

35

Broccoli

18

36

Cabbage

17

37

Bananas

16

38

Kiwi

14

39

Asparagus

11

40

Sweet Peas-Frozen

11

41

Mango

9

42

Pineapples

7

43

Sweet Corn-Frozen

2

44

Avocado

1

45 (best)

Onions

1 (lowest pesticide load)

View Full Data Set

Creative Commons License Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce by Environmental Working Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Add comment January 15th, 2009

World AIDS Day – Keep the Promise. Stop AIDS

World AIDS Day is 20 Bloggers Unite

December 1, 2008 marks the 20th anniversary of celebrating World AIDS Day, a day set aside to recognize the disease that has killed over 25 million since it was identified in 1981.

The focus on this 20th anniversary is how the response to AIDS has greatly changed, some for the positive, but an anniversary provides an opportunity to highlight how much more still needs to be done.

Take the Test. Take Control.

World AIDS Day. Take the test. Take control. www.hivtest.org A unique campaign has been developed using text messaging to promote HIV testing.

Mobile phone users can send a text message with their zip code to “KNOWIT” (566948). Within seconds, they will receive a text message identifying an HIV testing site near them.

This mobile phone service connects users with CDC’s testing database found at www.HIVtest.org.

Find out more about World AIDS Day at 20, 1988 – 2000.

Add comment December 1st, 2008

Reporting on Driving Under the Influence

I was able to find a short clip about a reporter who decided to become a volunteer drinker in a field sobriety test in this news report from 2007, on “How Much is Too Much?”

His report shows some of the sobriety checks done by police officers to determine if someone has had too much to drink.

Add comment November 25th, 2008

Television Ads are Contributing to Childhood Obesity

Boys Watching TelevisionA study published in the The Journal of Law and Economics by researchers at the City University of New York is showing what many parents and teachers already knew to be true, that television ads are contributing to childhood obesity.

In a research study supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases researchers Chou, Rashad and Grossman estimated that the effects of television fast-food restaurant advertising on children and adolescents are playing a role with children being overweight.

These researches predict that a ban on fast-food restaurant advertising would reduce the number of overweight children ages 3–11 in a fixed population by 18 percent and would reduce the number of overweight adolescents ages 12–18 by 14 percent.

In addition, eliminating the tax deductibility of junk food advertising would produce more declines of between 5 and 7 percent in these outcomes.

With estimates that children see over 30,000 television commercials a year and a third of them are for junk food, it is likely that eliminating junk food ads would go a long way in helping manage the advertising world’s contribution to promoting childhood obesity.

These findings go along with earlier ones conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation which found that “The vast majority of the foods that kids see advertised on television today are for products that nutritionists would tell us they need to be eating less of, not more of, if we’re going to get a handle on childhood obesity.”

Sources:

Rabin R. November 20, 2008. TV Ads Contribute to Childhood Obesity, Economists Say. New York Times.
Chou S, Rashad U, Grossman M. Fast-Food Restaurant Advertising on Television and Its Influence on Childhood Obesity. The Journal of Law and Economics. November 2008, Vol. 51, No. 4: pp. 599-618,
(doi: 10.1086/590132).
Associated Press. March 28, 2007. Children’s TV ads loaded with junk food. MSNBC.

Image Source: Game boy. Royalty Free Use.

Add comment November 22nd, 2008

MyPyramid.gov Now for Preschoolers

In Fall 2008, the U.S. Department of Agriculture launched the My Pyramid for Preschoolers Website just for Preschoolers, children aged 2-5. The site encourages parents and caregivers to

Use MyPyramid to help your preschooler eat well, be active, and be healthy.

Customized MyPyramid for Your Preschooler

MyPyramid for PreschoolersVisitors to the My Pyramid for Preschoolers Web site can “get a customized MyPyramid Plan for your preschooler” by entering the child’s first name, age, gender, and typical amount of daily activity. The site then generates a plan tailored to that child.

At the My Pyramid for Preschoolers website parents and caregivers can explore ways to help preschoolers:

The site provides a variety of information and resources for parents and caregivers wanting to ensure that their preschooler grows up healthy.

Downloads

The My Pyramid for Preschoolers Website also offers fun materials to download and print.

  • MyPyramid for Preschoolers PosterDownload a printable 8½” x 11″ mini poster of the image on this blog entry.
  • Two-Sided Bookmark – 5 per page, 3.1MB PDF
  • MyPyramid for Preschoolers Coloring SheetDownload the reproducible handout.
  • Making Your Job Easier/ Features of the MyPyramid for Preschoolers WebsiteDownload the 2-sided handout.

Some of the best points on the site is the reminder to parents is that:

Shopping for FoodYou can raise a healthy eater by setting a good example and practicing positive habits.

You are the most important influence on your child.

You can do many things to help your children develop healthy eating habits for life.

For more information about the MyPyramid for Preschoolers, visit the My Pyramid for Preschoolers Website.

Sources:

Hitti M. October 27, 2008. ‘My Pyramid for Preschoolers’ Debuts. WebMD.

Add comment November 17th, 2008

Fast Food = Lots of Corn Isotopes in that Hamburger

A news item update from a colleague on a new article published in the PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science) looking at the prevalence of corn isotopes in fast foods.

CheeseburgerThis new study researchers from the University of Hawaii sampled food from McDonald’s, Burger King, and Wendy’s chains and then used stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis to trace the input materials from these large fast food chains.

From these findings they were able to infer the source of feed to meat animals, the source of fat within fries, and the extent of fertilization and confinement inherent to production.

What they discovered was the overwhelming majority of American fast food is based on a single source – corn. This study highlights the overwhelming importance of corn agriculture within virtually every aspect of fast food manufacturing. The presence of corn in so much of the food has some pretty striking implications.

The Implications

Science Blogger Ed Yong offers these insights in his blog post from November 11, Corn is everywhere in American fast food:

Corn Feed…the fact that so much of said food can be traced back to corn has environmental implications. Corn feed is relatively cheap and provides farmers with a way of maximising the calories that their animals are eating for minimum cost.

But corn agriculture in the US is encouraged by heavy government subsidies, but has been criticised for being environmentally unsustainable. It encourages heavy use of both fertiliser (as revealed by the nitrogen isotope analysis) and pesticides.

Science blogger Revere, points out in the blog post on November 12, Fast food = corn, corn and more corn:

if we eat just one hamburger, one chicken sandwich and one small order of fries we will be getting 50% of our recommended calories for the day, 80% of our carbs and 75% of our protein (90% for women). We would also be getting a full day’s worth of saturated fat. And all for just about $3.

This is a pretty remarkable nutritional bargain, but of course there are hidden costs (beyond the heart attack on a plate aspect). Corn as a feedstock is not only wasteful but highly subsidized. Our cheap meal is being paid for in other ways (taxes).

Bottom Line

While fast food may be tempting, because it is cheap and inexpensive, you may ultimately be paying for it in several ways, not only through poor nutrition, high calories and high fat intake, but also by supporting corn as a wasteful, subsidized and environmentally unsustainable food source.

Sources:

A. H. Jahren, R. A. Kraft (2008). Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in fast food: Signatures of corn and confinement Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809870105 http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2008/11/10/0809870105

Yong E. November 11, 2008. Corn is everywhere in American fast food. Not Exactly Rocket Science.

Revere. Nobember 12, 2008. Fast food = corn, corn and more corn. Effect Measure.

Image Sources: Robert Owen-Wahl. Hamburger. Royalty Free Use. Maja. Corn. Royalty Free Use.

Add comment November 14th, 2008

Terms to use with Children – Overweight or Obese

Augustus GloopThere has been some debate going on in regards to the terms that should be used to indicate a child’s weight status.

For adults the categories are Underweight, Overweight and Obese, but these terms have been avoided in children.

Some doctors have avoided the blunt terms in particular “obese.” Instead, they refer to children many would consider too fat as being “at risk for overweight,” and “overweight” for those others would consider obese. These fuzzier labels let pediatricians “off the hook” when counseling patients who  need to lose weight.

Dr. Reginald Washington, a committee spokesman and member of the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that the reason for not using the actual terms has been of “fear that we’re going to stigmatize children, we’re going to take away their self-esteem, we’re going to label them.”

Recommendations

A committee of medical experts American Medical Association and funded by federal health officials including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended that the terms overweight or obese be applied to children.

The recommended terms are more accurate, but don’t mean that doctors need to be insensitive about using the terms.

The recommendations were endorsed by most of the organizations on the committee, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Dietetic Association, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and the American College of Preventive Medicine.

The CDC will consider whether to adopt the recommendations.

Reason for Concern – More Obese and Overweight Children

About 17% of U.S. children are obese and one-third are overweight, using the committee’s recommended definitions. Those numbers are rising, putting children at risk for diabetes, high blood pressure, cholesterol problems and other ailments more commonly found in adults.

Source:

Associated Press. June 12, 2007. Expert panel says to call kids ‘obese.’ USA Today.

Add comment November 10th, 2008

Next Posts Previous Posts


You make a decision about your health every time you take a bite or put something in your mouth.

Recent Posts

iChapters for Books

Additional Online Links

Calendar

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Search

Links

Textbook/eBook

Science vs. English Papers

Meta

Online Diet Analysis

Diet Analysis Plus 9.0 Windows/Macintosh Instant Access Code

Well Tip of the Day

EWG’s FoodNews

Food News

JEO Editorial Board Member


Add to Technorati Favorites

Higher Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Archives

Got Used Books?

Sell Used Books Online - Free Shipping, Free Quotes!

Living with Loss eBooklet

Copyright Information


© 2008-9 Kirsti A. Dyer MD, MS Creative Commons License, unless otherwise noted. Some rights reserved.