“May Contain Traces of Nuts” – FDA to Redefine Ambiguous Labeling

September 16, 2008




he Food and Drug Administration is finally looking at ways to force food makers to use a standard label system for allergens. They have agreed to host a public hearing in order to decide what the best course of action would be.

Shelled PeanutsAt issue is the statement “May Contain Traces of Nuts.” Many believe this statement is too ambiguous to prevent deadly reactions. Instead labels should list what they certainly contain. Clearer labels would be helpful for the 12 million Americans living with food allergies.

Under the current system food companies are required by the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 (FALCPA) to place labels on packaged foods containing most common food allergens, such as milk, eggs, fish, Crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, wheat, peanuts and soybeans, or any other ingredient that contains protein derived from one of these foods or food groups.

One popular choice would be for the FDA to have a standard number of descriptions that are clear and concise and require manufacturers to cite statistics to correctly define what “trace amount” means like “one part per million.”

According to The Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network there are more than 12 million Americans currently living with food allergies. In addition there are around 30,000 emergency room visits every year triggered by allergic reactions.

Joseph Brownstein et. al. September 16, 2008. FDA to Take a Close Look at Food Labels: Critics Say ‘May Contain’ Labels Don’t Do Enough to Protect People With Allergies. ABCNews.com

May contain nuts. September 16, 2008. JusticeNewsFlash.com

Alice Turner September 16, 2008 FDA Pushes Food Industry to Clarify Allergen Labels. eFluxMedia.

Image Source: Sanja Gjenero. Peanuts 3. Royalty Free Use.

Entry Filed under: Articles, Bio 50, Health, Nutrition. Tags: , , , , , .

Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1.    Tamara Bettanini  |  September 29th, 2008 at 3:02 pm

    It certainly makes sense that food labels should contain specific labeling, indicating the use of any of the foods on the major food allergin list. Person’s at risk for anaphalaxis have every reason to demand disclosure of products that could result in their death or serious harm.

Leave a comment

Required

Required, hidden

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


You make a decision about your health every time you take a bite or put something in your mouth.

Recent Posts

iChapters for Books

Additional Online Links

Calendar

September 2008
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Search

Links

Textbook/eBook

Science vs. English Papers

Meta

Online Diet Analysis

Diet Analysis Plus 9.0 Windows/Macintosh Instant Access Code

Well Tip of the Day

EWG’s FoodNews

Food News

JEO Editorial Board Member


Add to Technorati Favorites

Higher Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Archives

Got Used Books?

Sell Used Books Online - Free Shipping, Free Quotes!

Living with Loss eBooklet

Copyright Information


© 2008-9 Kirsti A. Dyer MD, MS Creative Commons License, unless otherwise noted. Some rights reserved.